EP 1110-3-8
9 Apr 04
TAPPs during the semiannual FUDS Program Execution Reviews and submit these summaries
to HQUSACE IAW table H-1.
(2) Army policy is that all FUDS properties with a restoration program determine
community interest in establishing and participating in a RAB. The district Commander is,
therefore, required either to establish a RAB at each FUDS property requiring cleanup or
document why a RAB cannot be established. Exceptions to establishing a RAB at the FUDS
property may be made in instances where the FUDS property owner objects to the establishment
of a RAB, or the FUDS project duration is so short (less than 1 year from an investigation phase
to a remedial/removal response completion phase) as to make RAB establishment infeasible, or
the FUDS property is in a remote location with no community nearby, or all major
environmental cleanup decisions for all FUDS projects for the entire FUDS property have
already been made. If a RAB is not being established, the rationale for not doing so will be
documented in an MFR which must be signed by the district Commander. A copy of this MFR
will be forwarded to the relevant MSC and HQUSACE (ATTN: CEMP-RF).
(3) DUSD(ES) requires reporting on the RAB and the TAPP data. The data will be
submitted to HQUSACE biannually by MSCs per table H-1. The data will be provided in tables
H-1 through H-9.
b. TAPP.
(1) When the district Commander provides support to a RAB or TRC through the TAPP
program, there are two distinct reporting requirements. The RAB/TRC is required to submit a
report (see paragraph 3-8d(6)). In addition, the district Commander will report on the results of
the TAPP project. The district Commander's report must be based on the RAB/TRC report to
the district Contracting Officer, and it must contain the following information:
(a) Name of the FUDS property and its identification number.
(b) Name of the assistance provider.
(c) Cost of the project.
(d) Duration of the project.
(e) Short description of the scope of the project.
(f) Short description of the results of the project.
(g) Discussion of any technical actions taken because project results conflicted with
previous USACE views.
3-23
Previous Page
