SECTION NINE
Observations and Lessons Learned
The project manager prepared for the worst weather possible at the site. Freezing pipes, power
outages, late deliveries, inability to move equipment and excavations filling with water are
examples of weather-related problems. These occurrences, if not anticipated, could have delayed
the project and been a source of additional costs.
Local emergency responders were involved with emergency response planning and drills. They
were provided with the required training and the necessary response equipment if they were not
already prepared for incinerator-related emergencies.
All pertinent federal and state regulations and guidance documents identified in the project
specifications were available on-site for reference.
Due to the large volume of information gathered and shared with outside agencies, a computer-
based information and issue tracking system was used for this project. The system contained
complete descriptions of the issues, responsible individuals, inception dates, and anticipated
resolution dates. The system was reviewed on a regular basis to track the status of outstanding
issues.
Before initiating site work, a cost-benefit analysis was performed to determine if a backup to the
primary laboratory should be selected. Selection of a backup laboratory at the beginning of the
project eliminated time spent for laboratory validation and approval, which could have impacted
the project in progress if a laboratory had not been selected prior to start of work.
An active safety incentive program increased worker safety awareness and reduced injuries and
accidents.
9-3
Slippery Chemical OU 3 Final RA Report
Previous Page
