EP 1110-1-18
24 Apr 00
on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the OE MCX. Additional information on the
specific procedures, team composition, and quality management requirements for UXO support
for construction activities is available from the OE MCX.
b. Responsibilities.
(1) Districts preparing to work on a project site with known or suspected OE (including
Civil Works) will coordinate the project the OE MCX.
(2) If a UXO Support action is deemed insufficient to address OE concerns, then an OE
response action must be initiated. The appropriate OE Design Center will be notified and a
response plan will be developed.
(3) The district is responsible for supervising the field work. The OE MCX will spot
check the field work to ensure conformance with the approved work plan and SSHP. Upon
completion of the field work, the district will prepare a draft report that will be sent to the OE
MCX for review.
(4) HTRW Design Districts should include anomaly avoidance capability in all applicable
indefinite delivery order contracts for HTRW reports, designs, or remedial actions on FUDS or
active military sites. Contact the OE MCX for applicable contract DIDs.
c. Documentation.
(1) The district is responsible for executing the preparation of SOWs and Work Plans for
anomaly avoidance and UXO support during construction activities. These documents will be
reviewed by the OE MCX.
(2) When an ESS is required for UXO Support activities, the OE Design Center is
responsible for executing the ESS. The ESS will be reviewed by the district, OE MCX and
HQUSACE. The ESS will be monitored by the MSC. Final approval of the ESS will be
provided by HQUSACE.
23-3
Previous Page
